Which statement about emergency protection orders is true?

Which statement about emergency protection orders is true?

• A. Municipal judges, acting as magistrates, may issue emergency protection orders for an offense involving family violence.
• B. Only justices of the peace may conduct peace bond hearings.
• C. Municipal court clerks may issue emergency protection orders.
• D. Municipal judges may not issue emergency protection orders.

Answer: (A)

Emergency protection orders provide immediate safety in family-violence cases by letting a judge act quickly to impose conditions. A municipal judge can issue an emergency protection order when they are acting in the capacity of a magistrate for offenses involving family violence. This ex parte order takes effect right away to protect the victim and is served on the respondent, who will have a scheduled hearing to determine whether the order should continue or be expanded. Clerks do not issue EPOs, and peace bond hearings are typically handled by a justice of the peace rather than a municipal judge issuing an EPO. So, the statement that municipal judges, acting as magistrates, may issue emergency protection orders for an offense involving family violence is the true one.

Emergency protection orders provide immediate safety in family-violence cases by letting a judge act quickly to impose conditions. A municipal judge can issue an emergency protection order when they are acting in the capacity of a magistrate for offenses involving family violence. This ex parte order takes effect right away to protect the victim and is served on the respondent, who will have a scheduled hearing to determine whether the order should continue or be expanded. Clerks do not issue EPOs, and peace bond hearings are typically handled by a justice of the peace rather than a municipal judge issuing an EPO. So, the statement that municipal judges, acting as magistrates, may issue emergency protection orders for an offense involving family violence is the true one.