Which statement best describes a general-law city with no home-rule charter?

Which statement best describes a general-law city with no home-rule charter?

• A. It operates under a charter
• B. It is governed by general laws of the state
• C. It has no municipal court
• D. It is led by a commissioner form of government

Answer: (B)

General-law cities in Texas operate under the state’s laws rather than a city-charter. If a city has no home-rule charter, it relies on the general laws of the state to govern its powers and structure. That’s why the statement describing it as being governed by general laws of the state is the best fit. A charter would indicate a home-rule city, so that first idea doesn’t apply here. The absence of a home-rule charter doesn’t automatically mean there’s no municipal court, and the form of government isn’t fixed by this status alone, so those options aren’t defining for a general-law city without a charter.

General-law cities in Texas operate under the state’s laws rather than a city-charter. If a city has no home-rule charter, it relies on the general laws of the state to govern its powers and structure. That’s why the statement describing it as being governed by general laws of the state is the best fit. A charter would indicate a home-rule city, so that first idea doesn’t apply here. The absence of a home-rule charter doesn’t automatically mean there’s no municipal court, and the form of government isn’t fixed by this status alone, so those options aren’t defining for a general-law city without a charter.